Skip to main content
· 3/28/2007

Zeno v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 480 F. Supp. 2d 825
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22338
  • 2007 WL 935474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing no-agency clause in contract between automobile dealer and manufacturer and citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 1.02 (“Parties’ Labeling and Popular Usage Not Controlling”
  • applying Pennsylvania law when concluding that “[a]n agency relationship . . . may establish ‘privity’ for the purposes of bringing a breach of contract claim by virtue of a principal being bound by act of its agents in certain circumstances.”
  • “In light of the law of Pennsylvania allowing nominal damages for breach of contract, summary judgment cannot be granted for failure to show damages.”
  • need to prove causation does not apply to a claim for nominal damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.