Skip to main content
· 2/26/1997

Zenith Insurance Company v. Breslaw

Citations

  • 108 F.3d 205
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 173
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 1994
  • 62 Cal. Comp. Cases 327
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1370
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a voluntary dismissal “was sufficient to confer prevailing party status on the [ ] defendants”
  • holding that a voluntary dismissal \was sufficient to confer prevailing party status on the [ ] defendants\
  • holding that a prevailing RICO defendant may receive attorney’s fees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)
  • remanding “because the district court failed to explain its decision in any detail”
  • remanding \because the district court failed to explain its decision in any detail\
  • abrogated on other grounds by Ass’n 18 of Mexican-American Educators v. State of Cal., 231 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 2000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.