· 2/26/1997
Zenith Insurance Company v. Breslaw
Citations
- 108 F.3d 205
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 173
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 1994
- 62 Cal. Comp. Cases 327
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1370
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a voluntary dismissal “was sufficient to confer prevailing party status on the [ ] defendants”
- holding that a voluntary dismissal \was sufficient to confer prevailing party status on the [ ] defendants\
- holding that a prevailing RICO defendant may receive attorney’s fees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)
- remanding “because the district court failed to explain its decision in any detail”
- remanding \because the district court failed to explain its decision in any detail\
- abrogated on other grounds by Ass’n 18 of Mexican-American Educators v. State of Cal., 231 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 2000
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.