Zengen, Inc. v. Comerica Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Nevada courts look to California law 14 where Nevada case law is silent
• noting 20 that comments to 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) are “persuasive in interpreting” 21 the corresponding provisions of the California Commercial Code because the California 22 legislature “adopted article 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code exactly as written”
• “[BJecause the situation [that formed] the basis of the plaintiff’s common-law claims ... is unequivocally addressed in the particular provisions of Article 4A, we conclude that those common-law claims are displaced by Article 4A .... ” (alterations omitted)
• “[B]ecause the situation [that formed] the basis of the plaintiff’s common-law claims . . . is unequivocally addressed in the particular provisions of Article 4A, we conclude that those common-law claims are displaced by Article 4A . . . .” (alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).