Zendejas v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Constitution does not protect acts of oral sex between unmarried adults, but declining to address whether an exception would exist for a married couple
• upholding Article 125 as applied to acts committed in a public place
• sexual act in a “semi-private” living area in the immediate vicinity of four to seven others who may or may not have been asleep
• “Where there is ‘a substantial range of conduct’ to which” a statute applies, the statute “is not fatally deficient, even though an area of uncertainty may remain.”
• where the Court of Military Appeals utilized a similar method of legal analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).