Zen Group, Inc. v. State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administra

Oral argument

• Argued

  33 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a taxpayer lacked standing to challenge, under the Statement and Account Clause of Article I, § 9, the secrecy of the Central Intelligence Agency's budget
• holding that a taxpayer did not have standing to obtain information about the expenditures of the Central Intelligence Agency under the Constitution’s Accounts Clause, art I, § 9, cl. 7
• holding that the plaintiff lacked standing where “the impact on him [wa]s plainly undifferentiated and common to all members of the public” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that a federal taxpayer does not have standing to challenge certain CIA expenditures as a violation of the Constitution’s Accounts Clause absent a showing that he suffered a particular injury
• holding that resting standing on a “generalized grievance” is inconsistent with “the framework of Article III” because “the impact on [the plaintiff] is plainly undifferentiated and ‘common to all members of the public’”
• holding citizens lacked standing to challenge statute when all citizens affected in the same way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).