Zempoalteca v. Ginsberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court held that where petitioner had consistently and substantially understated his income, that alone was persuasive evidence of fraudulent intent to evade taxes
• expenses incurred to board taxpayer's dogs are nondeductible personal expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).