Zemeckis v. Global Credit & Collection Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as a general rule, the potentially confusing or misleading “nature of a dunning letter [is treated] as a question of fact that, if well- pleaded, avoids dismissal on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.”
• applying Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), to FDCPA claims
• “As a general matter, we view the confusing nature of a dunning letter as a question of fact that, if well-pleaded, avoids dismissal on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.”
• “As a general matter, we view the confusing nature of a dunning letter as a question of fact that, if well‐pleaded, avoids dismissal on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).