Zelma v. MARKET USA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no affirmative act by legislature or highest state court was necessary for trial court to entertain private damage claims under the TCPA
• finding comparison of TCPA language with the language of other federal statutes not to be helpful
• “[T]he courts of this State have always embraced the principle that unless the federal act itself expressly or impliedly precludes states from assuming jurisdiction, the general jurisdiction of our courts will encompass federal statutory causes of action”
• following International Science and rejecting “opt-in” arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).