Zeller v. Southern Yacht Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that estop- pel applies to grounds not included in a petition that the petitioner reasonably could have raised
• determining that estop- pel applies to grounds not included in a petition that the petitioner reasonably could have raised
• explaining that “reasonably could have raised” in- cludes “any patent or printed publication that a petitioner actually knew about or that ‘a skilled searcher conducting a diligent search reasonably could have been expected to discover’”
• explaining that “reasonably could have raised” in- cludes “any patent or printed publication that a petitioner actually knew about or that ‘a skilled searcher conducting a diligent search reasonably could have been expected to discover’”
• involving both non-instituted and non-petitioned grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).