Zell v. American Seating Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts consider “only those manifestations of intention which are public („open to the scrutiny and knowledge of the community‟) and not private” (footnote omitted)
• reversed on another ground by U.S. Supreme Court, 322 U.S. 709, 64 S.Ct. 1053, 88 L.Ed. 1552

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).