Zeligman v. Juergens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The receiver’s function is to collect the assets, obey the court’s order, and in general to maintain and protect the property and the rights of the various parties.”
• “The receiver’s function is to collect the assets, obey the court’s order, and in general to maintain and protect the property and the rights of the various parties.”
• receiver cannot estop any party to the litigation by its acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ebel v. Ebel (In Re Ebel)
  D. Colorado· 1992-09-11· cited 19×
• Four Strong Winds, Inc. v. Lyngholm
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-01-16· cited 16×
• Nationsbank of Georgia v. Conifer Asset Management Ltd.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-04-04· cited 9×
• Eller Industries, Inc. v. Indian Motorcycle Manufacturing, Inc.
  D. Colorado· 1995-07-13· cited 4×
• K-Partners III, Ltd. v. WLM Hospitality Corp.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-09-08· cited 2×
• Midland Bank v. Galley Co.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1998-04-30· cited 2×
• v. Camel Point Ranch
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-07-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Talbot v. Jansen
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-02-16· cited 25×
• Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1985-05-09· cited 15×
• Hart v. Ed-Ley Corp.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1971-01-26· cited 12×
• Plateau Supply Co. v. Bison Meadows Corp.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1972-08-15· cited 8×