Zeitinger v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court's order holding a person in contempt did not violate the Missouri Constitution when the undisputed evidence showed that the appellant was collecting decedent's debt on her behalf and had the specific fund in his possession
• holding that the trial court’s order holding a person in contempt did not violate the Missouri Constitution when the undisputed evidence showed that the appellant was collecting decedent’s debt on her behalf and had the specific fund in his possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).