Zeisler v. Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a district court’s holding of non-infringement in an ANDA suit filed under § 271(e)(2)
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the fact-finder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “[W]eak secondary considerations generally do not overcome a strong prima facie case of obviousness.” (al- teration in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).