Skip to main content
· 3/30/2001

Zeising v. Kelly

Citations

  • 152 F. Supp. 2d 335
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3642
  • 2001 WL 310627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an agreement to pay compensation for negotiating financing fell within Section 5-701(a)(10) and was unenforceable without a subscribed writing
  • “Plaintiff cannot simply restate his contract claim, which is barred by the Statute of Frauds, in an attempt to obtain damages in a quasi-contractual claim.”
  • “Plaintiff cannot ‘cure’ his pleading deficiencies in the complaint by addressing them in his motion papers.”
  • “The New York Statute of Frauds provides that it ‘shall apply to a contract implied in fact or in law [i.e., a quasi-contract claim such as quantum meruit or unjust enrichment].’” (quoting N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5–701(a)(10))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.