Zeiser v. Brooklyn, Q. C. & S. Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 17 that relief under unfair competition law “stand[s] or 18 fall[s]” depending on the outcome of the antecedent 19 causes of action
• holding a UCL claim 24 stands or falls “depending on the fate of the antecedent substantive causes of action”
• “[Claims] for relief under the unfair 2 competition law []—stand or fall depending on the fate of the antecedent substantive causes of 3 action.”
• UCL claims “stand or fall depending on the fate of the antecedent substantive 16 causes of action”
• UCL claims “stand or fall depending on the fate of the antecedent substantive causes of 7 | action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).