Zeiler v. Deitsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether the award at issue had been satisfied was not relevant to whether the court should confirm the award
• holding that the Convention applied to an arbitration agreement between Israeli corporations and United States corporations because “[t]he commercial transactions decided in the arbitration have a clear international character”
• holding that the New York Convention applied to an arbitration agreement between Israeli corporations and United States corporations because “[t]he commercial transactions decided in the arbitration have a clear international character”
• holding that nominally interim orders were confirmable where “the arbitrators were asked to preside over the continuing process of sorting out the details of a commercial relationship, entering operative decisions along the way” and certain orders were “specific and final”
• holding that several accoun�ng orders concerning the accoun�ng and transfer of documents were final and therefore reviewable because they ordered specific ac�on and did not serve as a prepara�on or basis for further decisions by the arbitrators
• holding that although the arbitration was non-domestic (some of the assets at issue and some of the parties were foreign), because the arbitration took place in the United States, the awards were subject to the FAA provisions governing domestic arbitration awards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).