Zeigler v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “By making this determination, the Administration provided the policy decision Congress omitted” and thereby “has attempted through this regulation to supplement the [statute], not simply to construe it . . . .”
• “Congress has not legislated and indicated its will on th[is] question . . . therefore the Administration must have done more than exercise its power to fill up the details.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Congress has not legislated and indicated its will on th[is] question . . . , therefore the Administration must have done more than exercise its power to fill up the details.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• distinguishing between \constru[ing]\ a statutory provision and \supplement[ing]\ it
• distinguishing between “constru[ing]” a statutory provision and “supplement[ing]” it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).