Zeiger v. Pennsylvania Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the general elements of equitable estoppel, including that the person who asserts it must have been prejudiced
• modified on other grounds by Cobb v. Daugherty, 225 W. Va. 435, 693 S.E.2d 800 (2010)
• “... the power to grant or refuse or to modify, continue or dissolve a temporary or a permanent injunction ... will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a cleat-showing of an abuse of ... discretion.”
• “Unless an absolute right to injunctive relief is conferred by statute, the power to grant or refuse . . . a temporary or a permanent injunction, . . . ordinarily rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, according to the facts and the circumstances of the particular case[.]”
• setting forth factors for equitable estoppel analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).