Skip to main content
· 12/10/1951

Zehrlaut v. State

Citations

  • 102 N.E.2d 203
  • 230 Ind. 175
  • 1951 Ind. LEXIS 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding delay caused by defendant’s motion was not weighed against him when it was an “essential part of the procedural law of the state in criminal cases,” and reasonably contemplated in a criminal trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilkison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.