ZECK, JR., CHARLES J. v. GASPAR, VICTOR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “the admission of [inadmissible testimony] was harmless based on the overwhelming evidence that [the defendant] shot [the victim]”
• “A trial court does not err by considering a defendant’s lack of remorse at sentencing . . . .”
• setting forth standard for review of trial court’s discretionary decision
• requiring decision to be reached through exercise of reason
• requiring consistent application of legal standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).