· 2/6/1969
Zay Re Corp. v. United States
Citations
- 62 Cust. Ct. 795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The adequacy of the consideration ... [is] relevant to an appraisal of this understanding [of a seaman’s rights].”
- federal maritime rule allocating burden of proof displaced conflicting state rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rao
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.