Skip to main content
· 2/6/1969

Zay Re Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 62 Cust. Ct. 795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The adequacy of the consideration ... [is] relevant to an appraisal of this understanding [of a seaman’s rights].”
  • federal maritime rule allocating burden of proof displaced conflicting state rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rao

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.