Zavala v. Twin City Foods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
• recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
• recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
• recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
• recognizing that the court “did not improperly shift the burden of proof. . . .[by] noting the absence of any credible evidence that grandmother could assume the role of parent”
• noting that family court \possessed subject matter jurisdiction over the general type of controversy before it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).