Zavala v. Arizona State Personnel Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• questioning “whether a lower court should . . . reckon[] the retroactivity of a higher court’s opinion”
• applying supreme court decision retroactively where that decision did not otherwise specify that it would only apply prospectively
• “‘The general rule seems to be that where an administrative agency has been found to have acted in violation of procedural requirements or arbitrarily, the administrative agency is entitled to have the proceedings returned to it.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).