Zarnow v. City of Wichita Falls, Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to recognize “so strange an animal as pendent party interlocutory appellate jurisdiction” (citation omitted)
• refusing to recognize “so strange an animal as pendent party interlocutory appellate jurisdiction” (citation omitted)
• “[R]efus[ing] to recognize ‘so strange an animal as pendent party interlocutory appellate jurisdiction.’” (quoting McKee v. City of Rockwell, 877 F.2d 409, 413 (5th Cir. 1989))
• “Denial of . . . qualified immunity grounds typically falls within the collateral order doctrine, an exception to the final judgment rule.”
• “Denial of ... qualified immunity grounds typically falls within the collateral order doctrine, an exception to the final judgment rule.”
• “[i]f reasonable public officials could differ as to whether the defendants’ actions were lawful, the defendants are entitled to immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).