Zarges v. Bevan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that photocopy of note, together with affidavit stating that copy was “true and correct” copy of original, was sufficient to show status as owner and holder of note in summary judgment
• holding that photocopy of note attached to affidavit of holder, who swore it was true and correct copy, was proper summary judgment evidence and was sufficient as matter of law to prove status of owners and holders of note absent controverting summary judgment proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).