Zarco Supply Co. v. Bonnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conferring on Zarco standing to seek disqualification of opposing counsel because conflict “clearly calls into question „the fair or efficient administration of justice‟”
• reviewing order on motion to disqualify counsel by petition for writ of certiorari
• “attorneys owe a duty of confidentiality and loyalty to all their clients, including present and former co-clients”
• denial of motion to disqualify law firm based upon conflict of interest warranted interlocutory review
• “For interlocutory review by certiorari, it is not necessary to demonstrate actual prejudice in order to justify disqualification of opposing counsel.”
• “attorneys owe a duty of confidentiality and loyalty to all their clients, including present and former co-clients”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).