Skip to main content
· 2/10/2010

Zarate v. Zarate

Citations

  • 28 So. 3d 935
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1361
  • 2010 WL 445706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court miscalculated the husband’s child support obligation by failing to deduct the amount of permanent periodic alimony payments that he made to the wife from his monthly income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells, Shepherd, Lagoa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.