· 5/31/2002
Zaragoza v. Ebenroth
Citations
- 770 N.E.2d 1238
- 331 Ill. App. 3d 139
- 264 Ill. Dec. 542
- 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reliability is inferred where the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception
- reliability is inferred where the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception
- in order for a codefendant’s testimony of a conversation between the codefendant and the defendant to be admissible as a party admission, the defendant “must have been a party opponent, he must have made an admission, and the [codefendant’s] testimony must have been reliable”
- in order for a codefendant’s testimony of a conversation between the codefendant and the defendant to be admissible as a party admission, the defendant “must have been a party opponent, he must have made an admission, and the [codefendant’s] testimony must have been reliable”
- in order for a codefendant’s testimony of a conversation between the codefendant and the defendant to be admissible as a party admission, the defendant “must have been a party opponent, he must have made an admission, and the [codefendant’s] testimony must have been reliable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Homer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.