Skip to main content
· 2/7/1978

Zapuchlak v. Hucal

Citations

  • 262 N.W.2d 514
  • 82 Wis. 2d 184
  • 1978 Wisc. LEXIS 1137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘When a statute of frauds question arises, as here, several years after the agreement in question was made, the statute in effect at the time of the agreement controls.”
  • “property referred to in memorandum must be described to a reasonable certainty”
  • in the context of an insufficient land description under the statute of frauds, the “[f]ailure to comply with the statute renders the contract void. The question in such a case is not what reasonable [persons] intended to convey, or what the parties know ….” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanley, Callow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.