Zang v. Northwestern Title Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We cannot find a 12 1 sound basis for concluding that the Financial Code sections were 2 intended to abrogate the principles of contract and agency law 3 which allow for binding oral agreements.”
• “The conclusion that Northwestern and Chance owed Zang a fiduciary duty is a conclusion of law here consistent with a negligence theory. The trial court’s conclusion that the breach of fiduciary duty amounted to negligence was . . . substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).