Zandia Michele Mobley v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that resolution of the foreseeability criterion depends on the underlying facts
• noting that “the inquiry into whether a patentee can rebut the Festo presumption under the ‘tangantial’ criterion focuses on the patentee’s objectively apparent reason for the narrowing amendment”
• explaining that “whether an amendment was merely tangential to an alleged equivalent necessarily requires focus on the context in which the amendment was made”
• noting that if an equivalent is known in the field, then it is foreseeable
• noting that if an equivalent is known in the field, then it is foreseeable
• holding, inter alia, “that a ‘voluntary’ amendment may give rise to prosecution history estop-pel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).