Skip to main content
· 12/14/1994

Zanardi v. Zanardi

Citations

  • 647 So. 2d 298
  • 1994 WL 697448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the petitioner is entitled to an in camera review for the trial court to determine whether the assertion of attorney-client privilege is valid
  • stating that the petitioner is entitled to an in camera review for the trial court to determine whether the assertion of attorney-client privilege is valid
  • holding petitioner is entitled to an in camera inspection to determine if claim of attorney-client privilege is valid
  • petitioner entitled to in camera inspection to determine if claim of attorney-client privilege is valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Jorgenson and Gersten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.