· 12/14/1994
Zanardi v. Zanardi
Citations
- 647 So. 2d 298
- 1994 WL 697448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the petitioner is entitled to an in camera review for the trial court to determine whether the assertion of attorney-client privilege is valid
- stating that the petitioner is entitled to an in camera review for the trial court to determine whether the assertion of attorney-client privilege is valid
- holding petitioner is entitled to an in camera inspection to determine if claim of attorney-client privilege is valid
- petitioner entitled to in camera inspection to determine if claim of attorney-client privilege is valid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hubbart, Jorgenson and Gersten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.