Zana v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for joind in the separate trial of \the evidence of each charge would be admissible ence of the 2012 the other charge\ (emphases added)
• \[S]ealing orders are intended to permit individuals previously involved COURT OF APPEALS OF NEvADA 10 (0) I947B with the criminal justice system to pursue law-abiding citizenship unencumbered by records of past transgressions.\
• finding evidence of lewdness and possession of child pornography charges cross-admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).