Zamora v. Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \Noth the United States and Nevada Constitutions' equal protections clauses are implicated when a law treats similarly situated people differently\
• stating that in a civil case the constitution \guarantees the right to have factual issues determined by a jury\
• explaining that the party challenging constitutionality bears the burden of proof
• “statutes are presumed to be valid” and will be upheld unless “the constitution is clearly violated” (citing Universal Electric v. Labor Comm’r, 109 Nev. 127, 129, 847 P.2d 1372, 1373-74 (1993)
• \statutes are presumed to be valid\ and will be upheld unless \the constitution is clearly violated\ (citing Universal Electric v. Labor Comm'r, 109 Nev. 127, 129, 847 P.2d 1372, 1373-74 (1993))
• interpreting Nev. Const. art. 1, § 3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).