Skip to main content
· 4/30/1985

Zamiar v. Linderman

Citations

  • 478 N.E.2d 534
  • 132 Ill. App. 3d 886
  • 88 Ill. Dec. 219
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the plaintiffs invitation to enunciate a common law duty for social hosts providing alcohol to “supervise” intoxicated guests
  • rejecting the plaintiff's invitation to enunciate a common law duty for social hosts providing alcohol to \supervise\ intoxicated guests
  • dramshop act found exclusive remedy against licensees, but not employees of licensees, since the latter was not named in the act
  • dramshop act found exclusive remedy against licensees, but not employees of licensees, since the latter was not named in the act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.