· 4/30/1985
Zamiar v. Linderman
Citations
- 478 N.E.2d 534
- 132 Ill. App. 3d 886
- 88 Ill. Dec. 219
- 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the plaintiffs invitation to enunciate a common law duty for social hosts providing alcohol to “supervise” intoxicated guests
- rejecting the plaintiff's invitation to enunciate a common law duty for social hosts providing alcohol to \supervise\ intoxicated guests
- dramshop act found exclusive remedy against licensees, but not employees of licensees, since the latter was not named in the act
- dramshop act found exclusive remedy against licensees, but not employees of licensees, since the latter was not named in the act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.