Skip to main content
· 6/28/1996

Zamarron v. Pucinski

Citations

  • 668 N.E.2d 186
  • 282 Ill. App. 3d 354
  • 218 Ill. Dec. 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a fee to fund court automation because it benefits the entire court system
  • constitutionality of court filing surcharge to fund court automation analyzed under rational relation test
  • constitutionality of court filing surcharge to fund court automation analyzed under rational relation test
  • increased court filing fees and surcharge for court automation
  • increased court filing fees and surcharge for court automation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.