· 1/13/1997
Zamarripa v. Q & T Food Stores, Inc.
Citations
- 929 P.2d 1332
- 1997 Colo. LEXIS 41
- 1997 WL 9112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the terms “despite” and “notwithstanding” are often used interchangeably
- “Under the ordinary rule of statutory construction requiring us to give effect to the plain meaning of a statute’s wording . . . [an] omission must be viewed as intentional and given effect.”
- legislative omissions must be viewed as intentional and must be given effect
- “notwithstanding” means “without prevention or obstruction from or by”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hobbs, Vollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.