Skip to main content
· 1/13/1997

Zamarripa v. Q & T Food Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 929 P.2d 1332
  • 1997 Colo. LEXIS 41
  • 1997 WL 9112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the terms “despite” and “notwithstanding” are often used interchangeably
  • “Under the ordinary rule of statutory construction requiring us to give effect to the plain meaning of a statute’s wording . . . [an] omission must be viewed as intentional and given effect.”
  • legislative omissions must be viewed as intentional and must be given effect
  • “notwithstanding” means “without prevention or obstruction from or by”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobbs, Vollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.