Zamanov v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the agency is not compelled to accept petitioner’s explanations for testimonial discrepancies
• upholding adverse credibility determination where applicantʹs ʺsupplemental declaration and his testimony before the IJ tell a much different ‐‐ and more compelling ‐‐ story of persecution than his initial ‐ 26 ‐ application and testimony before the asylum officerʺ
• upholding adverse credibility determination where applicantʹs ʺsupplemental declaration and his testimony before the IJ tell a much different ‐‐ and more compelling ‐‐ story of persecution than his initial ‐ 26 ‐ application and testimony before the asylum officerʺ
• agency not required to accept explanations for inconsistencies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).