Zalmon Uvaydov v. Robert Fenwick-Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that regulation of purely intrastate Cave Species takes “is an essential part of’ ESA’s larger regulatory scheme
• holding that application of the ESA's take provision to intrastate species is a constitutional exercise of the Commerce Clause power
• noting that the key question is \whether the nature of the regulated activity is economic\
• noting that Congressional regulation is permissible only if \failure to regulate the... activity could `undercut' the entire scheme\
• noting that the key question is “whether the nature of the regulated activity is economic”
• noting that Congressional regulation is permissible only if “failure to regulate the . . . activity could ‘undercut’ the entire scheme”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).