· 1/7/1991
Zaleck v. Everett Clinic
Citations
- 802 P.2d 826
- 60 Wash. App. 107
- 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff who knew of his injury but failed to inquire of either a doctor or a lawyer was deemed to have failed to exercise due diligence
- plaintiff who knew of his injury but failed to inquire of either a doctor or a lawyer was deemed to have failed to exercise due diligence
- where plaintiff knew facts comprising causation and damage elements, his failure to simply inquire of lawyer or physician for over four years conclusively demonstrates lack of due diligence
- a reasonable person would have begun to doubt, sooner than in 4M> years, his physician's assurances that the patient's numb thumb, existing from the time of a painful injection of cortisone when the physician said he may have hit a nerve, was only a \temporary\ symptom
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winsor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.