Skip to main content
· 3/19/1975

Zale Corporation v. Rosenbaum

Citations

  • 520 S.W.2d 889
  • 18 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 266
  • 1975 Tex. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where due diligence is raised, \the limitation defense is not conclusively established until the movant meets his burden of negating the applicability of [this] issue[]\
  • holding that, where due diligence is raised, “the limitation defense is not conclusively established until the movant meets his burden of negating the applicability of [this] issue[]”
  • holding plaintiff had burden of proof on application of discovery rule to defendant = s statute-of-limitations defense
  • party moving to dismiss suit on ground that petition was filed but not served within applicable limitations period must conclusively establish that ground
  • movant for summary judgment on basis of limitations could not prevail where plaintiff raised applicability of suspension statute and movant failed to negate statute's applicability
  • requiring plaintiff merely to plead diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.