· 3/19/1975
Zale Corporation v. Rosenbaum
Citations
- 520 S.W.2d 889
- 18 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 266
- 1975 Tex. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, where due diligence is raised, \the limitation defense is not conclusively established until the movant meets his burden of negating the applicability of [this] issue[]\
- holding that, where due diligence is raised, “the limitation defense is not conclusively established until the movant meets his burden of negating the applicability of [this] issue[]”
- holding plaintiff had burden of proof on application of discovery rule to defendant = s statute-of-limitations defense
- party moving to dismiss suit on ground that petition was filed but not served within applicable limitations period must conclusively establish that ground
- movant for summary judgment on basis of limitations could not prevail where plaintiff raised applicability of suspension statute and movant failed to negate statute's applicability
- requiring plaintiff merely to plead diligence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.