Zakimi v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one silently delivered voicemail in violation of the TCPA was a concrete injury
• holding that one silently delivered voicemail in violation of the TCPA was a concrete injury
• observing that “the scope of liability for the actual tort of intrusion upon seclusion is . . . circumscribed” by the highly offensive requirement
• recounting that the common-law tort is derived from a “generalized privacy interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).