Zahran Ex Rel. Zahran v. New York Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs’ claims did not show that the district acted with gross negligence when plaintiffs alleged that the district “failed to make necessary evaluations to develop a proper IEP” and failed “to offer prompt administrative review”
• dismissing Section 504 claims because they were “substantially the same as . . . the IDEA claim”
• dismissing Rehabilitation Act claim because the claims were “substantially the same as that of the IDEA claim,” which were “essentially challenges to the program itself, not of any type of discriminatory decisions”
• dismissing a Rehabilitation Act claim because the underlying allegations were “substantially the same” as those underlying the IDEA claim, and the allegations were “essentially challenges to the program itself, not [to] any type of discriminatory decisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).