Zahl v. Krupa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants — directors and officers of a company — did not act recklessly, and thus were not liable for the fraudulent actions of an employee, when defendants loaned the employee money and gave him responsibility
• corporations are subject to vicarious liability for torts committed by their agents and employees
• corporations are subject to vicarious liability for torts committed by their agents and employees
• “ ‘in the absence of special circumstances it is the corporation *** who is the principal or employer, and thus subject to vicarious liability for torts committed by its employees or agents’ ” (quoting Meyers v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280, 286 (2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).