Zahdan v. Frontline Business Enterprise Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when a federal court considers a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), it must view the facts alleged in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and must give the non-moving party all reasonable inferences from those facts
• writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum does not alter prisoner’s custody status, but merely changes location of custody
• law was clearly established in 1989 that officers violated inmate’s Eighth Amendment rights by beating him while he was bound hand and foot in cell, even if he initially created disturbance and sustained no serious injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).