Zafarana v. Pfizer Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Pennsylvania law treats unjust enrichment as a form of quasi-contractual liability that will not substitute for an unsuccessful tort claim
• stating that “the plaintiff need not be in privity with the defendant in order to bring a claim” under the NJCFA”
• dismissing the plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim because (1) the plaintiff did not allege that the defendant refused to provide a service or good after securing a benefit, and (2
• “[A] patient in Pennsylvania cannot justifiably rely on the prescription drug manufacturer.”
• “Plaintiffs cannot claim any justifiable reliance, and their UTPCPL claim must fail.”
• “Plaintiffs' claims depend on a chain of reliance from Defendants to the prescribing physicians and the prescribing physicians to patients. This, however, cannot be used to allow Plaintiffs to claim that they justifiably relied on any representation made by Defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).