Zadan ex rel. Zadan v. Cohen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “decisions of the Court of Common Pleas are not binding precedent; however, they may be considered for their persuasive authority” (citations omitted)
• stating that plain view doctrine applies where police observe an item in plain view from a lawful vantage point, and the incriminating nature of the item is immediately apparent
• “[T]he plain view doctrine provides that evidence in plain view of the police can be seized without a warrant,” and it “applies if 1
• “We recognize that decisions of the Court of Common Pleas are not binding precedent; however, they may be considered for their persuasive authority.” (citation omitted)
• evidence is admissible under the inevitable discovery rule when the Commonwealth demonstrates that the evidence would have inevitably been discovered through lawful means

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).