Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Zack v. Crews

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 156
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 109
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3182
  • 571 U.S. 863
  • 2013 WL 2617824
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that on summary judgment, authentication objections can be cured with a supplemental affidavit from the moving party
  • holding when a supplemental life insurance policy “was but one menu item” in a larger employer- funded plan, it was not excluded from ERISA’s governance
  • noting that parties can submit supplemental affidavits to cure evidentiary defects
  • finding ERISA coverage over a voluntary, supplemental life insurance benefits plan where employer “maintained substantial administrative functions”
  • “Neither the rules of evidence nor the rules of civil procedure require lawyers or judges to raise all available ev‐ identiary objections.”
  • “Neither the rules of evidence nor the rules of civil procedure require lawyers or judges to raise all available ev‐ identiary objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.