· 10/7/2013
Zack v. Crews
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 156
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 109
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3182
- 571 U.S. 863
- 2013 WL 2617824
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that on summary judgment, authentication objections can be cured with a supplemental affidavit from the moving party
- holding when a supplemental life insurance policy “was but one menu item” in a larger employer- funded plan, it was not excluded from ERISA’s governance
- noting that parties can submit supplemental affidavits to cure evidentiary defects
- finding ERISA coverage over a voluntary, supplemental life insurance benefits plan where employer “maintained substantial administrative functions”
- “Neither the rules of evidence nor the rules of civil procedure require lawyers or judges to raise all available ev‐ identiary objections.”
- “Neither the rules of evidence nor the rules of civil procedure require lawyers or judges to raise all available ev‐ identiary objections.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.