Zaborac v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It would be extraordinarily bizarre to accept [the plaintiff’s] contention that Section 1692g(b) somehow bars what Section 1692c(a)(2) specifically directs,” which is subsequent communication by a debt collector with a debtor’s lawyer.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).