Zablocki, M. v. Beining, J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order directing a sale is not immediately appealable pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(7)
• “it is well-settled that [Superior Court] may raise the issue of [its] jurisdiction sua sponte”
• “it is well-settled that [Superior Court] may raise the issue of [its] jurisdiction sua sponte”
• where this Court quashed an appeal from a Rule 1570 order because the trial court had not first entered a Rule 1557 order.
• “[A]n order directing partition . . . must be filed prior to master proceedings.”
• appeal quashed where order appealed adopted findings of master’s report in partition action and granted authority to have parcel enter into multi-list agreement with broker, but left listing price indeterminate and (Footnote Continued Next Page

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A.A. and A.M. v. Glicken, S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-08-14· cited 12×
• Funk, D. v. Empfield, V.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-08-10· cited 11×
• G.K. v. LaBella, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-06-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hession Condemnation Case
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-05-21· cited 63×
• M. London, Inc. v. Fedders Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-17· cited 28×
• Calabrese v. Collier Township Municipal Authority
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-11-27· cited 21×
• Gasper v. Gasper
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-10· cited 13×